BDK reviving extinct animals
Should we bring revive extinct animals?
background
Stuart Pimm, for National Geographic notes, "De-extinction intends to resurrect single charismatic species". This tells what de-extinction intends to do. (page 2) Ferris Jabr, scientific American admits, "current cloning techniques have average success rate of less than 5 percent, even when working with familiar species; cloning wild animals is less than one percent successful." This is "good" and "bad". "good" because we can improve our technique of cloning and "bad"because our current attempts are largely unsuccessful. (page 1) Aisa-Pacific Economics blog explains that, "there are serious moral questions that must be awnsered." "is cloning extinct animals wrong?" This explains moral questions that have to be awnsered before we decide to clone extinct animals. (page 2)
Stuart Pimm, for National Geographic notes, "De-extinction intends to resurrect single charismatic species". This tells what de-extinction intends to do. (page 2) Ferris Jabr, scientific American admits, "current cloning techniques have average success rate of less than 5 percent, even when working with familiar species; cloning wild animals is less than one percent successful." This is "good" and "bad". "good" because we can improve our technique of cloning and "bad"because our current attempts are largely unsuccessful. (page 1) Aisa-Pacific Economics blog explains that, "there are serious moral questions that must be awnsered." "is cloning extinct animals wrong?" This explains moral questions that have to be awnsered before we decide to clone extinct animals. (page 2)
support
- Aisa-Pacific Economics blog states, "it would save human lives... this would increase the amount of people who could live long and fulfilling lives." We would benifit by saving human lives by reviving extinct animals. (page 1)
- Aisa-Pacific Economics blog claims, "we could save the envirment" We would help the envirment by reviving extinct animals. (page 1)
- Aisa-Pacific Economics blog notes, "It would expand our sientific knowledge" We would get more knowledge of de-extinction. (page 1)
- Ferris Jabr for sientific Americain admits, "Biologists have repeatedly suggested that cloning would help save endangered species" We could help endangered species by using the technology from the research of de-extinction. (page 3)
- Stewart Brand, for National Geographic News discusses, "why do we take enourmous trouble to protect endangered species? the same reasons apply to species brought back from extinction." This explains a view or point for de-extinction. This is another way to protect endangered species. (page 2)
- Stewart Brand, for National Geographic News argues that, "undo harm that humans caused" Humans have driven animals to extinction so it is our responsibility to bring them back. (page 2)
- Ferris Jabr, for Scientific American points out, "clones could theoretically increase the genetic diversity of an endangerd population" We could save endangered populations. (page 3)
- John Roach, for NBC News explains, "de-extinction, he said, could play a role within this translocation serum" Translocation serum are antibiotics so the de-extinction of organisms could help in deisease prevention and treatment.
- Stewart Brand, for National Geographic News notes, "useful sience will also emerge. Techniques being developed for de-extinction will also be directly applicable to living species that are close to extinction." More technology will be create. (page 3)
- Stewart Brand, for National Geographic News notes, "transmissible cancer... caused by a single gene. That gene can be silenced in a generation on of the animals realsed to the wild. The cancer would disappear in the wild soon after, because immune animals won't transmit it... until the entire population is immune." We could cure some forms of cancer from of cancer from animal populations. (page 4)
refute
- Asia-Pacific Economics blog states, "great temptation to make profits from this practice." The temptation of personal gain would be there and could cause problems with de-extinction. (page 2)
- Asia-Pacific Economics blog concludes, "good chance that we would cause harm to these cloned animals" This tells that we would hurt animals in the process of reviving extinct animals due to exploitation. (page 2)
- Stewart Brant, for National Geographic News claims, "humans killed off a lot of species over the last 10,000 years." We have done most of "this " and that is another reason that people think we should revive them.
- Stuart Pimm, for National Geographic News states, "where do we put them?" This shows the "big" question, "where do we put them?", when we revive extinct animals. Their habitat has changed or no longer in existence. (page 3)
- Staurt Pimm, for National Geographic News states, "can't we safely reduce the spotted owl to small numbers, keeping some in captivity as insurance? "the meaning is clear; "let's log out almost all of western north America's old-growth forests because, if we can save species with high tech solutions, the forest doesn't matter." This shows how some people look at this, one view is we don't need forests we have technology, but the other is we need the forests no matter what. (page 4)
- Stuart Pimm, for National Geographic News observes, "hunters ate this wild goat to extinction, re introduce resurrected ibex to the area where it belongs and it will become the most expensive cabrito ever eaten." If people make an animal extinct whats to say they wont do it again? That is the question asked in this quote. (page 3)
- Ferris Jabr, for Scientific American states, "the more suspect able it is to a single harmful genetic mutation or disease." We could cure some genetic mutations and diseases fro the research of the de-extinction process. (page 3)
- Asia-Pacific Economics blog concludes, "these animals would be undoubtedly exploited... we would be creating them solely for our purposes." Animals would be exploited by this process. (page 2)
- Staurt Pimm, for National Geographic News points out, "a resurrected Pyrean ibex will need a safe home, not just it's food plants." The problem about where" they will go and what we will feed them is still there. (page 2)
although reviving extinct animals would have a lot of challenges, humans could fix problems that they caused.